![]() ![]() While there is much to agree with Bloom on, there are a few points where we disagree (1) the definition of compassion, (2) data supporting why empathy, but not compassion, is bad, (3) the role of deliberation in moral judgment. There is indeed ample evidence that empathy is fraught with biases and we have, as Bloom, argued that deliberate mechanisms are needed to counteract the innumeracy and parochialism of empathy ( Slovic and Västfjäll, 2010). ![]() For all these reasons, Bloom argues that policy decision should not be motivated by empathy. Bloom's central premise is that empathy is narrow in its focus on single identified individuals, biased in that it favors the in-group, and can be used as a tool to motivate us to do things that are not optimally effective, or even destructive (e.g., motivate war). In “Empathy and its discontents” Bloom (2017: see also Bloom, 2016) argues that we should abandon empathy as a moral compass in favor of compassion. We Should Be Equally Discontent with Empathy and Compassion ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |